Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs HLFZX
FWWNX vs HLFZX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs HLFZX
FWWNX vs HLFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. HLFZX (117M). HLFZX pays higher dividends than FWWNX: HLFZX (3.58) vs FWWNX (1.21). FWWNX was incepted earlier than HLFZX: FWWNX (6 years) vs HLFZX (9 years). HLFZX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). FWWNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. HLFZX (29.00). FWWNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLFZX: FWWNX (250) vs HLFZX (2500000). FWWNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.61 vs. HLFZX (13.34). FWWNX (21.10) and HLFZX (20.96) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWWNX | HLFZX | FWWNX / HLFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.25 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.742 | 2.320 | 722% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.6B | 117M | 73,162% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 3.58 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.61 | 13.34 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.62 | 39.67 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.10 | 20.96 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement