Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs MCYSX
FWWNX vs MCYSX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs MCYSX
FWWNX vs MCYSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. MCYSX (130M). FWWNX pays higher dividends than MCYSX: FWWNX (1.21) vs MCYSX (1.00). FWWNX was incepted earlier than MCYSX: FWWNX (6 years) vs MCYSX (9 years). MCYSX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). MCYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 189.00 vs. FWWNX (46.00). MCYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWNX: MCYSX (0) vs FWWNX (250). MCYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.68 vs. FWWNX (19.59). MCYSX return over 5 years is better than : 25.29 vs. FWWNX (15.81).
| FWWNX | MCYSX | FWWNX / MCYSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.01 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.38 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.686 | 23.199 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 130M | 69,769% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.00 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.59 | 41.68 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.95 | 77.63 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.81 | 25.29 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement