Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs NOEMX
FWWNX vs NOEMX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs NOEMX
FWWNX vs NOEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. NOEMX (3.28B). NOEMX pays higher dividends than FWWNX: NOEMX (2.00) vs FWWNX (1.21). FWWNX was incepted earlier than NOEMX: FWWNX (6 years) vs NOEMX (20 years). FWWNX (0.62) is less costly to investors than NOEMX (0.28). FWWNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. NOEMX (12.17). FWWNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NOEMX: FWWNX (250) vs NOEMX (2500). NOEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 54.52 vs. FWWNX (29.85). NOEMX return over 5 years is better than : 48.25 vs. FWWNX (23.01).
| FWWNX | NOEMX | FWWNX / NOEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.15 | 413% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.28 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.145 | 29.910 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 3.28B | 2,771% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 2.00 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.85 | 54.52 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.04 | 76.93 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.01 | 48.25 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 168.31 | - |