Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs PCEMX
FWWNX vs PCEMX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs PCEMX
FWWNX vs PCEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. PCEMX (572M). PCEMX pays higher dividends than FWWNX: PCEMX (1.57) vs FWWNX (1.23). FWWNX was incepted earlier than PCEMX: FWWNX (6 years) vs PCEMX (31 years). PCEMX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). PCEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FWWNX (46.00). FWWNX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCEMX: FWWNX (250) vs PCEMX (10000). PCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.13 vs. FWWNX (21.89). PCEMX return over 5 years is better than : 34.84 vs. FWWNX (19.69).
| FWWNX | PCEMX | FWWNX / PCEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.20 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.39 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.013 | 23.993 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 572M | 15,857% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.57 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.89 | 40.13 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.69 | 68.29 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.69 | 34.84 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 112.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement