Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs RDWCX
FWWNX vs RDWCX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs RDWCX
FWWNX vs RDWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWNX vs. RDWCX commentary
Aug 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWNX is a Hold and RDWCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. RDWCX (2.64B). FWWNX pays higher dividends than RDWCX: FWWNX (1.23) vs RDWCX (1.15). FWWNX was incepted earlier than RDWCX: FWWNX (6 years) vs RDWCX (13 years). RDWCX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). RDWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FWWNX (46.00). FWWNX (250) and RDWCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RDWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.23 vs. FWWNX (20.71). RDWCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.56 vs. FWWNX (20.82).
| FWWNX | RDWCX | FWWNX / RDWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.43 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.43 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.731 | 19.262 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 2.64B | 3,356% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.15 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.71 | 31.23 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.22 | 69.75 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.82 | 33.56 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 86.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement