Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs REGRX
FWWNX vs REGRX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs REGRX
FWWNX vs REGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. REGRX (1.34B). REGRX pays higher dividends than FWWNX: REGRX (1.64) vs FWWNX (1.21). FWWNX was incepted earlier than REGRX: FWWNX (6 years) vs REGRX (10 years). REGRX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). REGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FWWNX (46.00). REGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWNX: REGRX (0) vs FWWNX (250). REGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.62 vs. FWWNX (26.81). REGRX return over 5 years is better than : 28.60 vs. FWWNX (17.40).
| FWWNX | REGRX | FWWNX / REGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.02 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.14 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.189 | 30.883 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 1.34B | 6,773% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.64 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.81 | 55.62 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.93 | 95.59 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.40 | 28.60 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 117.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement