Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs REMSX
FWWNX vs REMSX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs REMSX
FWWNX vs REMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. REMSX (1.23B). REMSX pays higher dividends than FWWNX: REMSX (1.56) vs FWWNX (1.21). FWWNX was incepted earlier than REMSX: FWWNX (6 years) vs REMSX (33 years). REMSX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). REMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FWWNX (46.00). REMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWNX: REMSX (0) vs FWWNX (250). REMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.73 vs. FWWNX (19.59). REMSX return over 5 years is better than : 23.62 vs. FWWNX (15.81).
| FWWNX | REMSX | FWWNX / REMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.17 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.29 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.686 | 23.709 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 1.23B | 7,368% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.56 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.59 | 41.73 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.95 | 77.05 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.81 | 23.62 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement