Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs REMYX
FWWNX vs REMYX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs REMYX
FWWNX vs REMYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWNX vs. REMYX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWNX is a Hold and REMYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. REMYX (1.28B). REMYX pays higher dividends than FWWNX: REMYX (1.72) vs FWWNX (1.21). FWWNX was incepted earlier than REMYX: FWWNX (6 years) vs REMYX (18 years). REMYX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). REMYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FWWNX (46.00). FWWNX has a lower initial minimum investment than REMYX: FWWNX (250) vs REMYX (10000000). REMYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.40 vs. FWWNX (21.15). REMYX return over 5 years is better than : 26.03 vs. FWWNX (18.26).
| FWWNX | REMYX | FWWNX / REMYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.99 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.09 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.451 | 24.283 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 1.28B | 6,927% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.72 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.15 | 37.40 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.32 | 85.37 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.26 | 26.03 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers