Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs RMMTX
FWWNX vs RMMTX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs RMMTX
FWWNX vs RMMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. RMMTX (1.21B). RMMTX pays higher dividends than FWWNX: RMMTX (1.65) vs FWWNX (1.21). FWWNX was incepted earlier than RMMTX: FWWNX (6 years) vs RMMTX (9 years). RMMTX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). RMMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FWWNX (46.00). RMMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWNX: RMMTX (0) vs FWWNX (250). RMMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.29 vs. FWWNX (20.43). RMMTX return over 5 years is better than : 19.91 vs. FWWNX (16.08).
| FWWNX | RMMTX | FWWNX / RMMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.07 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.29 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.668 | 21.668 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 1.21B | 7,506% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.65 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.43 | 39.29 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.10 | 78.45 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.08 | 19.91 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers