Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs HCACX
FXAIX vs HCACX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs HCACX
Hartford Capital Appreciation C
Price$25.54
Change+$0.20 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.12B
FXAIX vs HCACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. HCACX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and HCACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 666B vs. HCACX (6.12B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than HCACX: FXAIX (1.20) vs HCACX (0.23). FXAIX was incepted earlier than HCACX: FXAIX (14 years) vs HCACX (27 years). HCACX (1.85) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). HCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCACX: FXAIX (0) vs HCACX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.92 vs. HCACX (-5.78). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 116.25 vs. HCACX (-0.94).
| FXAIX | HCACX | FXAIX / HCACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.85 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.85 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.467 | 2.818 | 265% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 666B | 6.12B | 10,884% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.23 | 511% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.92 | -5.78 | -258% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.72 | 17.11 | 419% |
| Returns for 5 years | 116.25 | -0.94 | -12,408% |
| Returns for 10 years | 233.53 | -19.24 | -1,214% |