Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs HCACX
FXAIX vs HCACX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs HCACX
Hartford Capital Appreciation C
Price$23.20
Change+$0.14 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.63B
FXAIX vs HCACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. HCACX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and HCACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 594B vs. HCACX (5.63B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than HCACX: FXAIX (1.34) vs HCACX (0.25). FXAIX was incepted earlier than HCACX: FXAIX (14 years) vs HCACX (27 years). HCACX (1.85) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). HCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCACX: FXAIX (0) vs HCACX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.00 vs. HCACX (-11.27). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 107.31 vs. HCACX (-4.11).
| FXAIX | HCACX | FXAIX / HCACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.85 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.85 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.872 | -7.166 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 594B | 5.63B | 10,554% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.25 | 525% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.00 | -11.27 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.66 | 2.33 | 2,047% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.31 | -4.11 | -2,610% |
| Returns for 10 years | 192.42 | -28.71 | -670% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers