Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs HCACX
FXAIX vs HCACX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs HCACX
Hartford Capital Appreciation C
Price$26.27
Change+$0.08 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.14B
FXAIX vs HCACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. HCACX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and HCACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 682B vs. HCACX (6.14B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than HCACX: FXAIX (1.19) vs HCACX (0.23). FXAIX was incepted earlier than HCACX: FXAIX (14 years) vs HCACX (27 years). HCACX (1.85) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). HCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCACX: FXAIX (0) vs HCACX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.40 vs. HCACX (-5.47). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 98.97 vs. HCACX (-8.87).
| FXAIX | HCACX | FXAIX / HCACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.85 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.85 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.106 | 5.435 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 682B | 6.14B | 11,106% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 0.23 | 513% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.40 | -5.47 | -318% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.09 | 15.15 | 449% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.97 | -8.87 | -1,116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 260.49 | -12.79 | -2,036% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement