Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs HCACX
FXAIX vs HCACX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs HCACX
Hartford Capital Appreciation C
Price$24.53
Change+$0.22 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.87B
FXAIX vs HCACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. HCACX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and HCACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 634B vs. HCACX (5.87B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than HCACX: FXAIX (1.26) vs HCACX (0.24). FXAIX was incepted earlier than HCACX: FXAIX (14 years) vs HCACX (27 years). HCACX (1.85) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). HCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCACX: FXAIX (0) vs HCACX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.43 vs. HCACX (-8.94). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 100.49 vs. HCACX (-8.47).
| FXAIX | HCACX | FXAIX / HCACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.85 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.85 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.537 | -2.134 | -72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 634B | 5.87B | 10,795% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.24 | 518% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.43 | -8.94 | -139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.35 | 2.62 | 1,887% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.49 | -8.47 | -1,187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 212.02 | -24.15 | -878% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement