Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs HCACX
FXAIX vs HCACX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs HCACX
FXAIX vs HCACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. HCACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and HCACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 859B vs. HCACX (6.13B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than HCACX: FXAIX (1.03) vs HCACX (0.00). FXAIX was incepted earlier than HCACX: FXAIX (15 years) vs HCACX (28 years). HCACX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). HCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCACX: FXAIX (0) vs HCACX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.58 vs. HCACX (-2.40). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 82.76 vs. HCACX (-22.43).
| FXAIX | HCACX | FXAIX / HCACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.86 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.86 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.790 | 7.417 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859B | 6.13B | 14,006% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.58 | -2.40 | -692% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.90 | 15.13 | 508% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.76 | -22.43 | -369% |
| Returns for 10 years | 294.63 | -5.43 | -5,425% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement