Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LAMHX
FXAIX vs LAMHX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMHX
FXAIX vs LAMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMHX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 832B vs. LAMHX (4.98B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMHX: FXAIX (1.03) vs LAMHX (0.82). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMHX: FXAIX (15 years) vs LAMHX (11 years). LAMHX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.57 vs. LAMHX (17.18). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 94.64 vs. LAMHX (42.59).
| FXAIX | LAMHX | FXAIX / LAMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.59 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.59 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.562 | 7.727 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 832B | 4.98B | 16,693% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.82 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.57 | 17.18 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.73 | 56.11 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.64 | 42.59 | 222% |
| Returns for 10 years | 301.46 | 108.53 | 278% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement