Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs MLVBX
FXAIX vs MLVBX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MLVBX
FXAIX vs MLVBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MLVBX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and MLVBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 859B vs. MLVBX (311M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MLVBX: FXAIX (1.03) vs MLVBX (0.04). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MLVBX: FXAIX (15 years) vs MLVBX (13 years). MLVBX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MLVBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLVBX: FXAIX (0) vs MLVBX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.74 vs. MLVBX (-5.59). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 82.85 vs. MLVBX (-14.14).
| FXAIX | MLVBX | FXAIX / MLVBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.64 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.68 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.236 | 6.232 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859B | 311M | 276,206% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.04 | 2,520% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.74 | -5.59 | -281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.30 | 1.90 | 4,019% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.85 | -14.14 | -586% |
| Returns for 10 years | 290.39 | 54.45 | 533% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement