Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs MLVGX
FXAIX vs MLVGX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MLVGX
FXAIX vs MLVGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MLVGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and MLVGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 859B vs. MLVGX (309M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MLVGX: FXAIX (1.03) vs MLVGX (0.07). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MLVGX: FXAIX (15 years) vs MLVGX (13 years). MLVGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MLVGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLVGX: FXAIX (0) vs MLVGX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.58 vs. MLVGX (-7.24). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 82.76 vs. MLVGX (-15.68).
| FXAIX | MLVGX | FXAIX / MLVGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.64 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.68 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.790 | 5.722 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859B | 309M | 277,994% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.07 | 1,523% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.58 | -7.24 | -229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.90 | 1.37 | 5,606% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.76 | -15.68 | -528% |
| Returns for 10 years | 294.63 | 53.98 | 546% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement