Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs MNVRX
FXAIX vs MNVRX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MNVRX
FXAIX vs MNVRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MNVRX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and MNVRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. MNVRX (371M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MNVRX: FXAIX (1.30) vs MNVRX (0.77). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MNVRX: FXAIX (14 years) vs MNVRX (12 years). MNVRX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MNVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNVRX: FXAIX (0) vs MNVRX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.10 vs. MNVRX (-8.54). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 92.75 vs. MNVRX (32.81).
| FXAIX | MNVRX | FXAIX / MNVRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.73 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.73 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.000 | -10.055 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598B | 371M | 161,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.77 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.10 | -8.54 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.20 | 0.53 | 3,034% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.75 | 32.81 | 283% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.34 | 29.23 | 545% |