Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs MNVRX
FXAIX vs MNVRX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MNVRX
FXAIX vs MNVRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MNVRX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and MNVRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 634B vs. MNVRX (405M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MNVRX: FXAIX (1.26) vs MNVRX (0.77). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MNVRX: FXAIX (14 years) vs MNVRX (12 years). MNVRX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MNVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNVRX: FXAIX (0) vs MNVRX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.68 vs. MNVRX (2.28). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 118.26 vs. MNVRX (39.58).
| FXAIX | MNVRX | FXAIX / MNVRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.73 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.73 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.229 | 0.650 | 651% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 634B | 405M | 156,543% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.77 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.68 | 2.28 | 556% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.41 | 24.65 | 257% |
| Returns for 5 years | 118.26 | 39.58 | 299% |
| Returns for 10 years | 223.41 | 49.51 | 451% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement