Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs MNVRX
FXAIX vs MNVRX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MNVRX
FXAIX vs MNVRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MNVRX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and MNVRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 737B vs. MNVRX (346M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MNVRX: FXAIX (1.11) vs MNVRX (0.77). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MNVRX: FXAIX (15 years) vs MNVRX (12 years). MNVRX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MNVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNVRX: FXAIX (0) vs MNVRX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.64 vs. MNVRX (-8.74). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 100.37 vs. MNVRX (13.12).
| FXAIX | MNVRX | FXAIX / MNVRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.73 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.73 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.677 | -2.018 | -727% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 737B | 346M | 213,006% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.77 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.64 | -8.74 | -167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.65 | 16.97 | 446% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.37 | 13.12 | 765% |
| Returns for 10 years | 251.30 | 40.26 | 624% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement