Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs MNVRX
FXAIX vs MNVRX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MNVRX
FXAIX vs MNVRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MNVRX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and MNVRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 859B vs. MNVRX (299M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MNVRX: FXAIX (1.03) vs MNVRX (0.53). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MNVRX: FXAIX (15 years) vs MNVRX (13 years). MNVRX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MNVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNVRX: FXAIX (0) vs MNVRX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.58 vs. MNVRX (0.94). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 82.76 vs. MNVRX (6.40).
| FXAIX | MNVRX | FXAIX / MNVRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.73 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.73 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.790 | 5.498 | 214% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859B | 299M | 287,291% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.53 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.58 | 0.94 | 1,764% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.90 | 11.85 | 649% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.76 | 6.40 | 1,293% |
| Returns for 10 years | 294.63 | 59.31 | 497% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement