Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs MNVRX
FXAIX vs MNVRX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MNVRX
FXAIX vs MNVRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MNVRX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and MNVRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 832B vs. MNVRX (317M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MNVRX: FXAIX (1.03) vs MNVRX (0.54). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MNVRX: FXAIX (15 years) vs MNVRX (13 years). MNVRX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MNVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNVRX: FXAIX (0) vs MNVRX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.57 vs. MNVRX (2.61). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 94.64 vs. MNVRX (11.50).
| FXAIX | MNVRX | FXAIX / MNVRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.73 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.73 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.562 | 5.215 | 222% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 832B | 317M | 262,461% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.54 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.57 | 2.61 | 1,134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.73 | 20.29 | 418% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.64 | 11.50 | 823% |
| Returns for 10 years | 301.46 | 59.69 | 505% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement