Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs MRGCX
FXAIX vs MRGCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MRGCX
FXAIX vs MRGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MRGCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and MRGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 859B vs. MRGCX (6.38B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MRGCX: FXAIX (1.03) vs MRGCX (0.00). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MRGCX: FXAIX (15 years) vs MRGCX (30 years). MRGCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MRGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MRGCX: FXAIX (0) vs MRGCX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.58 vs. MRGCX (-6.09). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 82.76 vs. MRGCX (2.43).
| FXAIX | MRGCX | FXAIX / MRGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.63 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.64 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.790 | 8.734 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859B | 6.38B | 13,472% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.58 | -6.09 | -272% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.90 | 18.91 | 407% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.76 | 2.43 | 3,399% |
| Returns for 10 years | 294.63 | 82.69 | 356% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement