Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs MRGCX
FXAIX vs MRGCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MRGCX
FXAIX vs MRGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MRGCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and MRGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 832B vs. MRGCX (6.35B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MRGCX: FXAIX (1.03) vs MRGCX (0.00). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MRGCX: FXAIX (15 years) vs MRGCX (29 years). MRGCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MRGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MRGCX: FXAIX (0) vs MRGCX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.51 vs. MRGCX (0.78). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 88.11 vs. MRGCX (5.38).
| FXAIX | MRGCX | FXAIX / MRGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.63 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.64 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 6.537 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 832B | 6.35B | 13,113% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.51 | 0.78 | 3,261% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.88 | 19.60 | 402% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.11 | 5.38 | 1,639% |
| Returns for 10 years | 306.65 | 87.76 | 349% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement