Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs MRGHX
FXAIX vs MRGHX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MRGHX
FXAIX vs MRGHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MRGHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and MRGHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 859B vs. MRGHX (6.38B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MRGHX: FXAIX (1.03) vs MRGHX (0.29). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MRGHX: FXAIX (15 years) vs MRGHX (21 years). MRGHX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MRGHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX (0) and MRGHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.58 vs. MRGHX (-2.21). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 82.76 vs. MRGHX (14.42).
| FXAIX | MRGHX | FXAIX / MRGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.88 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.89 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.790 | 9.290 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859B | 6.38B | 13,472% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.29 | 353% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.58 | -2.21 | -751% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.90 | 28.32 | 272% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.76 | 14.42 | 574% |
| Returns for 10 years | 294.63 | 118.36 | 249% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement