Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NMIAX
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NMIAX
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NMIAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NMIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 833B vs. NMIAX (507M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: FXAIX (1.06) vs NMIAX (0.59). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NMIAX: FXAIX (15 years) vs NMIAX (30 years). NMIAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMIAX: FXAIX (0) vs NMIAX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.55 vs. NMIAX (3.61). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 82.96 vs. NMIAX (-0.01).
| FXAIX | NMIAX | FXAIX / NMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.83 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.22 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.128 | 3.036 | 334% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 833B | 507M | 164,300% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.59 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.55 | 3.61 | 541% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.29 | 20.94 | 336% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.96 | -0.01 | -596,466% |
| Returns for 10 years | 284.67 | 43.96 | 648% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers