Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NMIAX
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NMIAX
FXAIX vs NMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NMIAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NMIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 832B vs. NMIAX (485M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: FXAIX (1.03) vs NMIAX (0.63). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NMIAX: FXAIX (15 years) vs NMIAX (30 years). NMIAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMIAX: FXAIX (0) vs NMIAX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.57 vs. NMIAX (14.00). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 94.64 vs. NMIAX (5.28).
| FXAIX | NMIAX | FXAIX / NMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.83 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.21 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.562 | 8.836 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 832B | 485M | 171,546% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.63 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.57 | 14.00 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.73 | 35.65 | 238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.64 | 5.28 | 1,793% |
| Returns for 10 years | 301.46 | 56.00 | 538% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement