Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NSBAX
FXAIX vs NSBAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NSBAX
FXAIX vs NSBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NSBAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NSBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 859B vs. NSBAX (6.18B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NSBAX: FXAIX (1.03) vs NSBAX (0.76). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NSBAX: FXAIX (15 years) vs NSBAX (20 years). NSBAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NSBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBAX: FXAIX (0) vs NSBAX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.58 vs. NSBAX (-6.11). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 82.76 vs. NSBAX (22.39).
| FXAIX | NSBAX | FXAIX / NSBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.91 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.91 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.790 | 1.039 | 1,135% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859B | 6.18B | 13,891% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.76 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.58 | -6.11 | -271% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.90 | 20.43 | 376% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.76 | 22.39 | 370% |
| Returns for 10 years | 294.63 | 96.77 | 304% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement