Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NSBAX
FXAIX vs NSBAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NSBAX
FXAIX vs NSBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NSBAX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NSBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 828B vs. NSBAX (6.4B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NSBAX: FXAIX (1.04) vs NSBAX (0.79). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NSBAX: FXAIX (15 years) vs NSBAX (20 years). NSBAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NSBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBAX: FXAIX (0) vs NSBAX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.58 vs. NSBAX (-2.66). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 84.39 vs. NSBAX (23.88).
| FXAIX | NSBAX | FXAIX / NSBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.91 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.91 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.967 | 0.974 | 1,023% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 828B | 6.4B | 12,944% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.79 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.58 | -2.66 | -774% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.02 | 20.08 | 384% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.39 | 23.88 | 353% |
| Returns for 10 years | 289.18 | 96.07 | 301% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement