Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NSBCX
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NSBCX
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NSBCX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and NSBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 832B vs. NSBCX (6.31B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: FXAIX (1.03) vs NSBCX (0.14). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NSBCX: FXAIX (15 years) vs NSBCX (20 years). NSBCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: FXAIX (0) vs NSBCX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.12 vs. NSBCX (-3.84). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 83.77 vs. NSBCX (17.11).
| FXAIX | NSBCX | FXAIX / NSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.66 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.66 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.719 | -2.311 | -291% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 832B | 6.31B | 13,177% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.14 | 716% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.12 | -3.84 | -576% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.37 | 17.21 | 432% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.77 | 17.11 | 490% |
| Returns for 10 years | 287.54 | 81.32 | 354% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement