Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NSBCX
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NSBCX
Nuveen Dividend Growth C
Price$66.51
Change-$0.19 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.49B
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NSBCX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NSBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 696B vs. NSBCX (6.49B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: FXAIX (1.16) vs NSBCX (0.15). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NSBCX: FXAIX (14 years) vs NSBCX (19 years). NSBCX (1.67) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: FXAIX (0) vs NSBCX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.20 vs. NSBCX (3.25). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 112.25 vs. NSBCX (53.18).
| FXAIX | NSBCX | FXAIX / NSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.67 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.67 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.949 | 8.458 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 696B | 6.49B | 10,732% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.15 | 801% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.20 | 3.25 | 591% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.98 | 34.53 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 112.25 | 53.18 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 265.00 | 100.73 | 263% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers