Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NSBCX
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NSBCX
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NSBCX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a StrongBuy and NSBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 859B vs. NSBCX (6.28B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: FXAIX (1.03) vs NSBCX (0.08). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NSBCX: FXAIX (15 years) vs NSBCX (20 years). NSBCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: FXAIX (0) vs NSBCX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.18 vs. NSBCX (-4.30). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 84.71 vs. NSBCX (18.68).
| FXAIX | NSBCX | FXAIX / NSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.66 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.66 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.979 | 2.012 | 645% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859B | 6.28B | 13,681% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.08 | 1,249% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.18 | -4.30 | -446% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.97 | 19.43 | 406% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.71 | 18.68 | 453% |
| Returns for 10 years | 298.83 | 88.91 | 336% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement