Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs NSBCX
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NSBCX
Nuveen Dividend Growth C
Price$56.83
Change-$1.48 (-2.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.84B
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NSBCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and NSBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. NSBCX (5.84B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: FXAIX (1.30) vs NSBCX (0.16). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NSBCX: FXAIX (14 years) vs NSBCX (19 years). NSBCX (1.67) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: FXAIX (0) vs NSBCX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. NSBCX (2.04). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 111.09 vs. NSBCX (52.51).
| FXAIX | NSBCX | FXAIX / NSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.67 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.67 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.913 | -4.975 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598B | 5.84B | 10,240% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.16 | 797% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.13 | 2.04 | 349% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.44 | 8.78 | 335% |
| Returns for 5 years | 111.09 | 52.51 | 212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 185.32 | 65.44 | 283% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...