Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs NSBCX
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NSBCX
Nuveen Dividend Growth C
Price$62.66
Change-$0.73 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.45B
FXAIX vs NSBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NSBCX commentary
Feb 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a StrongBuy and NSBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 639B vs. NSBCX (6.45B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NSBCX: FXAIX (1.31) vs NSBCX (0.33). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NSBCX: FXAIX (14 years) vs NSBCX (19 years). NSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBCX: FXAIX (0) vs NSBCX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.99 vs. NSBCX (11.78). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 98.97 vs. NSBCX (41.26).
| FXAIX | NSBCX | FXAIX / NSBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.633 | 3.681 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 639B | 6.45B | 9,907% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.33 | 394% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.99 | 11.78 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.91 | 20.95 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.97 | 41.26 | 240% |
| Returns for 10 years | 216.37 | 77.66 | 279% |