Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NSGCX
FXAIX vs NSGCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NSGCX
FXAIX vs NSGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NSGCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NSGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 859B vs. NSGCX (1.46B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NSGCX: FXAIX (1.03) vs NSGCX (0.01). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NSGCX: FXAIX (15 years) vs NSGCX (27 years). NSGCX (1.85) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NSGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSGCX: FXAIX (0) vs NSGCX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.58 vs. NSGCX (6.08). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 82.76 vs. NSGCX (22.64).
| FXAIX | NSGCX | FXAIX / NSGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.65 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.85 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.790 | 3.347 | 352% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859B | 1.46B | 59,038% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.01 | 18,593% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.58 | 6.08 | 273% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.90 | 34.79 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.76 | 22.64 | 366% |
| Returns for 10 years | 294.63 | 97.31 | 303% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement