Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs RCLIX
FXAIX vs RCLIX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs RCLIX
T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core I
Price$38.62
Change+$3.06 (+8.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.36B
FXAIX vs RCLIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. RCLIX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and RCLIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. RCLIX (16.4B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than RCLIX: FXAIX (1.30) vs RCLIX (0.73). FXAIX was incepted earlier than RCLIX: FXAIX (14 years) vs RCLIX (8 years). RCLIX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). RCLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.40 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCLIX: FXAIX (0) vs RCLIX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.10 vs. RCLIX (-10.76). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 92.75 vs. RCLIX (57.55).
| FXAIX | RCLIX | FXAIX / RCLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.58 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.58 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.000 | -13.437 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598B | 16.4B | 3,646% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.73 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.10 | -10.76 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.20 | 6.76 | 240% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.75 | 57.55 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.34 | N/A | - |