Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs RCLIX
FXAIX vs RCLIX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs RCLIX
FXAIX vs RCLIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. RCLIX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and RCLIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 859B vs. RCLIX (18.2B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than RCLIX: FXAIX (1.03) vs RCLIX (0.50). FXAIX was incepted earlier than RCLIX: FXAIX (15 years) vs RCLIX (10 years). RCLIX (0.57) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). RCLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.40 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCLIX: FXAIX (0) vs RCLIX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.58 vs. RCLIX (5.95). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 82.76 vs. RCLIX (35.33).
| FXAIX | RCLIX | FXAIX / RCLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.57 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.57 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.790 | 11.584 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859B | 18.2B | 4,720% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.50 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.58 | 5.95 | 279% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.90 | 47.66 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.76 | 35.33 | 234% |
| Returns for 10 years | 294.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement