Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs RFNGX
FXAIX vs RFNGX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs RFNGX
FXAIX vs RFNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. RFNGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and RFNGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 832B vs. RFNGX (183B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than RFNGX: FXAIX (1.03) vs RFNGX (0.85). FXAIX was incepted earlier than RFNGX: FXAIX (15 years) vs RFNGX (17 years). RFNGX (0.28) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). RFNGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFNGX: FXAIX (0) vs RFNGX (250). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.51 vs. RFNGX (23.58). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 88.11 vs. RFNGX (43.76).
| FXAIX | RFNGX | FXAIX / RFNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.28 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.28 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 12.698 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 832B | 183B | 455% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.85 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.51 | 23.58 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.88 | 61.77 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.11 | 43.76 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 306.65 | 117.01 | 262% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement