Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs RSIPX
FXAIX vs RSIPX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs RSIPX
Columbia Disciplined Core Inst2
Price$13.36
Change+$0.23 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.21B
FXAIX vs RSIPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. RSIPX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and RSIPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. RSIPX (4.21B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than RSIPX: FXAIX (1.30) vs RSIPX (0.89). FXAIX was incepted earlier than RSIPX: FXAIX (14 years) vs RSIPX (18 years). RSIPX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). RSIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and RSIPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.42 vs. RSIPX (-6.52). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 104.55 vs. RSIPX (29.45).
| FXAIX | RSIPX | FXAIX / RSIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.71 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.71 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.250 | -11.043 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598B | 4.21B | 14,201% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.89 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.42 | -6.52 | -114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.00 | 1.82 | 1,707% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.55 | 29.45 | 355% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.96 | 40.05 | 447% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers