Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs RSIPX
FXAIX vs RSIPX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs RSIPX
FXAIX vs RSIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. RSIPX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and RSIPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 859B vs. RSIPX (5.17B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than RSIPX: FXAIX (1.03) vs RSIPX (0.66). FXAIX was incepted earlier than RSIPX: FXAIX (15 years) vs RSIPX (20 years). RSIPX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). RSIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX (0) and RSIPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.58 vs. RSIPX (3.59). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 82.76 vs. RSIPX (9.23).
| FXAIX | RSIPX | FXAIX / RSIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.68 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.68 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.790 | 10.099 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859B | 5.17B | 16,625% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.66 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.58 | 3.59 | 461% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.90 | 33.27 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.76 | 9.23 | 896% |
| Returns for 10 years | 294.63 | 82.14 | 359% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement