Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs SICWX
FXAIX vs SICWX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs SICWX
Touchstone Large Cap Focused Y
Price$80.01
Change-$0.20 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.61B
FXAIX vs SICWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. SICWX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and SICWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 696B vs. SICWX (3.61B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than SICWX: FXAIX (1.16) vs SICWX (0.46). FXAIX was incepted earlier than SICWX: FXAIX (14 years) vs SICWX (18 years). SICWX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). SICWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 6.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SICWX: FXAIX (0) vs SICWX (2500). FXAIX (19.20) and SICWX (18.34) have marching annual gain over last year. FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 112.25 vs. SICWX (74.98).
| FXAIX | SICWX | FXAIX / SICWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.74 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.80 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.949 | 13.152 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 696B | 3.61B | 19,258% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.46 | 255% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.20 | 18.34 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.98 | 67.08 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 112.25 | 74.98 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 265.00 | 112.97 | 235% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement