Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs SICWX
FXAIX vs SICWX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs SICWX
FXAIX vs SICWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. SICWX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and SICWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 828B vs. SICWX (3.44B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than SICWX: FXAIX (1.04) vs SICWX (0.42). FXAIX was incepted earlier than SICWX: FXAIX (15 years) vs SICWX (19 years). SICWX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). SICWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 7.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SICWX: FXAIX (0) vs SICWX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.80 vs. SICWX (8.92). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 80.30 vs. SICWX (42.45).
| FXAIX | SICWX | FXAIX / SICWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.73 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.77 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.910 | 2.404 | 371% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 828B | 3.44B | 24,056% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.42 | 247% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.80 | 8.92 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.79 | 48.51 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.30 | 42.45 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 278.32 | 116.40 | 239% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement