Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs TRSCX
FXAIX vs TRSCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs TRSCX
Nuveen Large Cap Responsible Eq Ret
Price$28.05
Change-$0.46 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
FXAIX vs TRSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. TRSCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and TRSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 634B vs. TRSCX (6.62B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than TRSCX: FXAIX (1.26) vs TRSCX (0.93). FXAIX was incepted earlier than TRSCX: FXAIX (14 years) vs TRSCX (23 years). TRSCX (0.42) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). TRSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and TRSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.73 vs. TRSCX (-1.21). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 114.26 vs. TRSCX (48.83).
| FXAIX | TRSCX | FXAIX / TRSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.42 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.42 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.375 | 5.867 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 634B | 6.62B | 9,574% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.93 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.73 | -1.21 | -1,054% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.26 | 29.83 | 232% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.26 | 48.83 | 234% |
| Returns for 10 years | 215.06 | 74.93 | 287% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers