Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs TRSCX
FXAIX vs TRSCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs TRSCX
Nuveen Large Cap Responsible Eq Ret
Price$29.87
Change-$0.21 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.4B
FXAIX vs TRSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. TRSCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and TRSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 696B vs. TRSCX (6.4B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than TRSCX: FXAIX (1.16) vs TRSCX (0.86). FXAIX was incepted earlier than TRSCX: FXAIX (14 years) vs TRSCX (23 years). TRSCX (0.42) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). TRSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and TRSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.32 vs. TRSCX (1.31). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 103.70 vs. TRSCX (38.69).
| FXAIX | TRSCX | FXAIX / TRSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.42 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.42 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.170 | 10.917 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 696B | 6.4B | 10,873% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.86 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.32 | 1.31 | 1,471% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.35 | 30.27 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.70 | 38.69 | 268% |
| Returns for 10 years | 261.06 | 95.19 | 274% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement