Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs TRSCX
FXAIX vs TRSCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs TRSCX
FXAIX vs TRSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. TRSCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and TRSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 859B vs. TRSCX (5.83B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than TRSCX: FXAIX (1.03) vs TRSCX (0.75). FXAIX was incepted earlier than TRSCX: FXAIX (15 years) vs TRSCX (24 years). TRSCX (0.42) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). TRSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX (0) and TRSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.58 vs. TRSCX (9.35). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 82.76 vs. TRSCX (14.50).
| FXAIX | TRSCX | FXAIX / TRSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.42 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.42 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.790 | 12.325 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859B | 5.83B | 14,744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.75 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.58 | 9.35 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.90 | 31.37 | 245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.76 | 14.50 | 571% |
| Returns for 10 years | 294.63 | 107.99 | 273% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement