FXG
Price
$63.05
Change
+$0.82 (+1.32%)
Updated
Jun 26, 03:42 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
225.28M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLP
Price
$84.73
Change
+$0.79 (+0.94%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
13.79B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FXG vs XLP

FXG vs XLP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX® Fund (FXG) vs. State Street® Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR® ETF (XLP)

Key Takeaways

  • FXG employs an active-style AlphaDEX selection methodology targeting alpha generation in consumer staples from the Russell 1000 Index, with ~40 holdings and a higher expense ratio of 0.63%.
  • XLP is a passive, market-cap-weighted ETF tracking the S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, featuring 36 holdings concentrated in large-cap leaders and a low expense ratio of 0.08%.
  • FXG offers broader sector exposure including healthcare (8%) and consumer cyclical (8%), while XLP is nearly 100% pure consumer staples.
  • XLP demonstrates superior liquidity with $14.6 billion AUM (assets under management, total value of fund assets) versus FXG's ~$244 million.
  • Both provide defensive positioning, but XLP's mega-cap focus delivers lower volatility and consistent performance in recent market cycles.
  • Cost efficiency and diversification profile favor XLP for long-term sector exposure.

Introduction

FXG and XLP offer investors targeted access to the consumer staples sector, known for its resilience amid economic uncertainty. While both ETFs focus on essential goods producers and retailers, they differ structurally: FXG uses a factor-based approach to select stocks potentially generating alpha relative to traditional benchmarks, whereas XLP provides straightforward replication of S&P 500 consumer staples giants. This comparison is timely as sector rotation toward defensives accelerates in recent months, driven by interest rate dynamics and macroeconomic caution. Investors seeking staples exposure must weigh FXG's enhanced selection methodology against XLP's cost efficiency and liquidity, especially as capital flows favor established passive vehicles in volatile environments.

First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX® Fund (FXG) Overview

The First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX® Fund (FXG) tracks the StrataQuant® Consumer Staples Index, a modified equal-dollar weighted benchmark designed to identify stocks from the Russell 1000® Index in the consumer staples sector that may generate positive alpha (excess returns) through the proprietary AlphaDEX® methodology. This rules-based, quantitative strategy ranks stocks on growth and value factors before tiered equal-weighting, aiming for outperformance versus passive peers.

FXG holds approximately 40 stocks, providing moderate diversification. Top holdings as of recent data include CASY (Casey's General Stores, ~4.6%), COKE (Coca-Cola Consolidated, ~4.4%), DAR (Darling Ingredients, ~4.2%), SEB (Seaboard, ~4.1%), and INGR (Ingredion, ~4.1%).

Sector allocation emphasizes consumer defensive at ~80%, with ~8% in healthcare, ~8% consumer cyclical, and ~4% industrials. The expense ratio is 0.63%, reflecting the enhanced selection process. As a passive fund with smart beta elements, FXG rebalances quarterly to maintain its factor tilts. It suits investors pursuing potential alpha in staples with mid-cap exposure.

State Street® Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR® ETF (XLP) Overview

The State Street® Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR® ETF (XLP) tracks the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, comprising large-cap consumer staples companies from the S&P 500. This passive, market-cap-weighted strategy delivers precise sector exposure to food, beverages, household products, and retailers.

XLP maintains ~36 holdings, with significant concentration in top names: WMT (Walmart, ~12.1%), COST (Costco, ~9.4%), PG (Procter & Gamble, ~7.2%), KO (Coca-Cola, ~6.4%), and PM (Philip Morris International, ~5.6%). Top 10 holdings account for ~63%.

Sector allocation is nearly 100% consumer staples, subdivided into distribution/retail (~34%), beverages (~20%), food products (~17%), household products (~16%), tobacco (~10%), and personal care (~4%). The expense ratio is a low 0.08%, supporting cost-efficient access. XLP rebalances with S&P index methodology, typically quarterly. Its scale and liquidity make it ideal for broad, low-volatility staples positioning.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The consumer staples sector thrives on steady demand for essentials, acting as a defensive haven during economic slowdowns or volatility spikes. Recent market cycles have seen capital inflows into staples amid interest rate uncertainty, fiscal stimulus expectations, and geopolitical tensions, with ETFs like XLP attracting record flows. Catalysts include easing input costs, pricing power in branded goods, and a barbell economy favoring premium/discounted products over mid-tier. Risks encompass inflation resurgence, tariff impacts on supply chains, and competition from private labels. Macro shifts like lower rates bolster dividend-paying staples, reinforcing the sector's low-beta (market sensitivity) profile versus cyclicals.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months through early 2026, XLP has shown relative strength, benefiting from mega-cap stability and sector rotation into defensives, with YTD gains outpacing FXG amid broader market broadening. FXG's factor tilts toward mid-caps and value/growth blends introduced higher volatility, lagging in rallies driven by large-cap retailers like WMT and COST. Over longer cycles, XLP's lower beta (~0.60) and cost efficiency support steadier returns tied to S&P 500 staples momentum, while FXG's AlphaDEX seeks outperformance via holdings like DAR during commodity upswings. Volatility differences highlight XLP's edge in risk-averse positioning.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (total market value of a company), technical indicators like moving averages, price patterns including breakouts, and performance metrics like relative strength. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across sectors like consumer staples. Explore it today to uncover ETF insights tailored to your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors XLP due to its superior cost efficiency (0.08% expense ratio), expansive liquidity, pure sector exposure, and consistent trend alignment with mega-cap staples momentum. While FXG's AlphaDEX methodology offers potential for alpha in value-driven cycles, XLP's diversified large-cap profile and lower volatility provide a probabilistic edge (~65% confidence) for defensive positioning amid ongoing sector flows.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FXG vs. XLP commentary
Jun 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXG is a Hold and XLP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLP has more net assets: 13.8B vs. FXG (225M). XLP has a higher annual dividend yield than FXG: XLP (9.421) vs FXG (3.535). FXG was incepted earlier than XLP: FXG (19 years) vs XLP (28 years). XLP (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FXG (0.63). FXG has a higher turnover XLP (8.00) vs XLP (8.00).
FXGXLPFXG / XLP
Gain YTD3.5359.42138%
Net Assets225M13.8B2%
Total Expense Ratio0.630.08788%
Turnover81.008.001,013%
Yield2.882.62110%
Fund Existence19 years28 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FXGXLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FXG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYEAX279.88N/A
N/A
Rydex Energy H
FIKZX23.39N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Z
TQCRX21.49N/A
N/A
Touchstone Dividend Equity R6
MUXYX30.15N/A
N/A
Victory S&P 500 Index Y
TISVX19.21N/A
N/A
Transamerica International Sm Cp Val I

FXG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FXG has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FXG jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FXG
1D Price
Change %
FXG100%
-0.11%
GIS - FXG
67%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
CAG - FXG
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
PEP - FXG
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.93%
STZ - FXG
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
MDLZ - FXG
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
More

XLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLP has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLP jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLP
1D Price
Change %
XLP100%
-0.59%
CL - XLP
72%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
PG - XLP
71%
Closely correlated
-2.33%
MDLZ - XLP
67%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
PEP - XLP
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.93%
CHD - XLP
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
More