Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXI vs MCHS
FXI vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts FXI vs MCHS
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Price$39.10
Change-$0.41 (-1.04%)
Volume$321.81K
Net Assets6.6B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$32.53
Change-$0.10 (-0.31%)
Volume$100
Net Assets2.66M
FXI vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXI vs. MCHS commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXI is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXI has more net assets: 6.6B vs. MCHS (2.66M). FXI has a higher annual dividend yield than MCHS: FXI (31.627) vs MCHS (28.093). FXI was incepted earlier than MCHS: FXI (21 years) vs MCHS (2 years). FXI (0.74) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover FXI (26.00) vs FXI (26.00).
| FXI | MCHS | FXI / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 31.627 | 28.093 | 113% |
| Net Assets | 6.6B | 2.66M | 248,271% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.89 | 83% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 115.31 | 23% |
| Yield | 2.42 | 4.17 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FXI | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XFIV | 49.65 | 0.08 | +0.16% |
| BondBloxx Bloomberg FiveYrTrgDurUSTrsETF | |||
| EVSD | 51.46 | 0.05 | +0.10% |
| Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF | |||
| WTBN | 25.68 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| WisdomTree Bianco Fixed Inc Ttl Ret ETF | |||
| FDIS | 95.89 | -1.61 | -1.65% |
| Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discret ETF | |||
| ESIX | 29.78 | -0.67 | -2.18% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P SmCap 600 ESGETF | |||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | -1.46% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.22% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.05% |