Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXI vs MCHS
FXI vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts FXI vs MCHS
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Price$38.90
Change+$0.57 (+1.49%)
Volume$26.1M
Net Assets6.64B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$33.00
Change+$0.65 (+2.01%)
Volume$202
Net Assets2.59M
FXI vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXI vs. MCHS commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXI is a Hold and MCHS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXI has more net assets: 6.64B vs. MCHS (2.59M). FXI (29.595) and MCHS (29.548) have matching annual dividend yield . FXI was incepted earlier than MCHS: FXI (21 years) vs MCHS (2 years). FXI (0.74) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover FXI (18.00) vs FXI (18.00).
| FXI | MCHS | FXI / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 29.595 | 29.548 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 6.64B | 2.59M | 256,613% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.89 | 83% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 115.31 | 16% |
| Yield | 2.47 | 4.18 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FXI | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | +2.01% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 36% Loosely correlated | +3.18% |