Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXI vs MCHS
FXI vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts FXI vs MCHS
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Price$40.49
Change+$0.49 (+1.23%)
Volume$40.08M
Net Assets6.76B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$33.44
Change+$0.40 (+1.21%)
Volume$128
Net Assets2.62M
FXI vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXI vs. MCHS commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXI is a Buy and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXI has more net assets: 6.76B vs. MCHS (2.62M). FXI has a higher annual dividend yield than MCHS: FXI (34.892) vs MCHS (31.288). FXI was incepted earlier than MCHS: FXI (21 years) vs MCHS (2 years). FXI (0.74) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover FXI (18.00) vs FXI (18.00).
| FXI | MCHS | FXI / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 34.892 | 31.288 | 112% |
| Net Assets | 6.76B | 2.62M | 258,031% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.89 | 83% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 115.31 | 16% |
| Yield | 2.33 | 4.04 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FXI | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QABA | 54.15 | 1.20 | +2.27% |
| First Trust NASDAQ® ABA Community Bk ETF | |||
| IYC | 103.69 | 0.75 | +0.73% |
| iShares US Consumer Discretionary ETF | |||
| LFBCF | 7.29 | N/A | N/A |
| Life & Banc Split Corp. | |||
| BUYZ | 41.94 | N/A | N/A |
| Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF | |||
| FXY | 61.03 | -0.12 | -0.20% |
| Invesco CurrencyShares® Japanese Yen | |||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.47% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | +4.52% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.59% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.34% |