Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXI vs MCHS
FXI vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts FXI vs MCHS
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Price$38.49
Change-$0.16 (-0.41%)
Volume$232.34K
Net Assets6.53B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$31.30
Change+$0.08 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.49M
FXI vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXI vs. MCHS commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXI is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXI has more net assets: 6.53B vs. MCHS (2.49M). FXI has a higher annual dividend yield than MCHS: FXI (28.196) vs MCHS (22.553). FXI was incepted earlier than MCHS: FXI (21 years) vs MCHS (2 years). FXI (0.74) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover FXI (18.00) vs FXI (18.00).
| FXI | MCHS | FXI / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 28.196 | 22.553 | 125% |
| Net Assets | 6.53B | 2.49M | 262,144% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.89 | 83% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 115.31 | 16% |
| Yield | 2.62 | 4.86 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FXI | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RMI | 13.91 | 0.01 | +0.08% |
| RiverNorth Opportunistic Municipal Income Fund | |||
| DMAR | 40.03 | 0.03 | +0.07% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Mar | |||
| OUNZ | 31.95 | -0.20 | -0.62% |
| VanEck Merk Gold Trust | |||
| STXI | 28.73 | -0.33 | -1.15% |
| Strive International Developed Mkts ETF | |||
| EEMO | 17.19 | -0.23 | -1.30% |
| Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Mom ETF | |||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 46% Loosely correlated | +6.85% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.89% |