Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXNCX vs MBGAX
FXNCX vs MBGAX Comparison
Open Charts FXNCX vs MBGAX
FXNCX vs MBGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXNCX vs. MBGAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXNCX is a Hold and MBGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXNCX has more cash in the bank: 578M vs. MBGAX (133M). FXNCX pays higher dividends than MBGAX: FXNCX (3.04) vs MBGAX (2.45). FXNCX was incepted earlier than MBGAX: FXNCX (39 years) vs MBGAX (33 years). MBGAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FXNCX (0.70). MBGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FXNCX (16.14). FXNCX (1000) and MBGAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.14 vs. MBGAX (7.39). FXNCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.07 vs. MBGAX (-0.91).
| FXNCX | MBGAX | FXNCX / MBGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.65 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.74 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.984 | 1.635 | 121% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 578M | 133M | 435% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 2.45 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.14 | 7.39 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.46 | 8.82 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.07 | -0.91 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.10 | 7.67 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement