Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXNCX vs MBGAX
FXNCX vs MBGAX Comparison
Open Charts FXNCX vs MBGAX
FXNCX vs MBGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXNCX vs. MBGAX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXNCX is a Hold and MBGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXNCX has more cash in the bank: 567M vs. MBGAX (135M). FXNCX pays higher dividends than MBGAX: FXNCX (3.16) vs MBGAX (2.54). FXNCX was incepted earlier than MBGAX: FXNCX (39 years) vs MBGAX (33 years). MBGAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FXNCX (0.71). FXNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.14 vs. MBGAX (13.00). FXNCX (1000) and MBGAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. MBGAX (3.91). FXNCX return over 5 years is better than : -2.71 vs. MBGAX (-3.70).
| FXNCX | MBGAX | FXNCX / MBGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.65 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.74 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.399 | -1.026 | 39% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 567M | 135M | 420% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 2.54 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | 3.91 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.82 | 7.46 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.71 | -3.70 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.03 | 3.72 | -28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers