Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXNCX vs MBMDX
FXNCX vs MBMDX Comparison
Open Charts FXNCX vs MBMDX
FXNCX vs MBMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXNCX vs. MBMDX commentary
Jun 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXNCX is a Hold and MBMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXNCX has more cash in the bank: 579M vs. MBMDX (160M). FXNCX pays higher dividends than MBMDX: FXNCX (3.04) vs MBMDX (2.48). FXNCX was incepted earlier than MBMDX: FXNCX (39 years) vs MBMDX (33 years). MBMDX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FXNCX (0.70). FXNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.14 vs. MBMDX (9.00). FXNCX (1000) and MBMDX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.72 vs. MBMDX (6.68). FXNCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.16 vs. MBMDX (-0.25).
| FXNCX | MBMDX | FXNCX / MBMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.60 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.76 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.888 | 1.449 | 130% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 579M | 160M | 362% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 2.48 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.72 | 6.68 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.25 | 9.48 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.16 | -0.25 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.00 | 9.39 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement