Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXNCX vs MBVAX
FXNCX vs MBVAX Comparison
Open Charts FXNCX vs MBVAX
FXNCX vs MBVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXNCX vs. MBVAX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXNCX is a Hold and MBVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXNCX has more cash in the bank: 587M vs. MBVAX (348M). FXNCX pays higher dividends than MBVAX: FXNCX (3.04) vs MBVAX (2.49). FXNCX was incepted earlier than MBVAX: FXNCX (39 years) vs MBVAX (33 years). MBVAX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FXNCX (0.70). FXNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.14 vs. MBVAX (9.00). FXNCX (1000) and MBVAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.54 vs. MBVAX (6.47). FXNCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.14 vs. MBVAX (-1.12).
| FXNCX | MBVAX | FXNCX / MBVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.57 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.65 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.370 | 1.814 | 131% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 587M | 348M | 169% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 2.49 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.54 | 6.47 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.62 | 8.65 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.14 | -1.12 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.30 | 6.93 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers