Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXNCX vs MBVAX
FXNCX vs MBVAX Comparison
Open Charts FXNCX vs MBVAX
FXNCX vs MBVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXNCX vs. MBVAX commentary
Jun 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXNCX is a Hold and MBVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXNCX has more cash in the bank: 578M vs. MBVAX (347M). FXNCX pays higher dividends than MBVAX: FXNCX (3.04) vs MBVAX (2.49). FXNCX was incepted earlier than MBVAX: FXNCX (39 years) vs MBVAX (33 years). MBVAX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FXNCX (0.70). FXNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.14 vs. MBVAX (14.00). FXNCX (1000) and MBVAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.14 vs. MBVAX (7.25). FXNCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.07 vs. MBVAX (-1.22).
| FXNCX | MBVAX | FXNCX / MBVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.57 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.65 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.984 | 1.420 | 140% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 578M | 347M | 167% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 2.49 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.14 | 7.25 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.46 | 8.41 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.07 | -1.22 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.10 | 7.65 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers