Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXNCX vs MGATX
FXNCX vs MGATX Comparison
Open Charts FXNCX vs MGATX
FXNCX vs MGATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXNCX vs. MGATX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXNCX is a Hold and MGATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXNCX has more cash in the bank: 567M vs. MGATX (134M). MGATX pays higher dividends than FXNCX: MGATX (3.56) vs FXNCX (3.16). FXNCX was incepted earlier than MGATX: FXNCX (39 years) vs MGATX (10 years). MGATX (0.74) and FXNCX (0.71) have similar cost to investors . FXNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.14 vs. MGATX (13.00). MGATX has a lower initial minimum investment than FXNCX: MGATX (0) vs FXNCX (1000). MGATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.86 vs. FXNCX (4.28). MGATX return over 5 years is better than : 1.17 vs. FXNCX (-2.71).
| FXNCX | MGATX | FXNCX / MGATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.65 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.74 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.399 | -0.433 | 92% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 567M | 134M | 423% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 3.56 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.28 | 4.86 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.93 | 10.75 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.71 | 1.17 | -232% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.11 | 13.90 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement