Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXNCX vs MLALX
FXNCX vs MLALX Comparison
Open Charts FXNCX vs MLALX
FXNCX vs MLALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXNCX vs. MLALX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXNCX is a Hold and MLALX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXNCX has more cash in the bank: 567M vs. MLALX (69.1M). MLALX pays higher dividends than FXNCX: MLALX (3.57) vs FXNCX (3.16). FXNCX was incepted earlier than MLALX: FXNCX (39 years) vs MLALX (10 years). MLALX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FXNCX (0.71). FXNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.14 vs. MLALX (14.00). MLALX has a lower initial minimum investment than FXNCX: MLALX (0) vs FXNCX (1000). MLALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. FXNCX (4.28). MLALX return over 5 years is better than : 0.28 vs. FXNCX (-2.71).
| FXNCX | MLALX | FXNCX / MLALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.66 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.86 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.399 | -0.373 | 107% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 567M | 69.1M | 821% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 3.57 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.28 | 4.65 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.93 | 11.05 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.71 | 0.28 | -980% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.11 | 13.09 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement