Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXNCX vs MMGAX
FXNCX vs MMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FXNCX vs MMGAX
FXNCX vs MMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXNCX vs. MMGAX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXNCX is a Hold and MMGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXNCX has more cash in the bank: 567M vs. MMGAX (135M). MMGAX (3.30) and FXNCX (3.16) have matching dividends . FXNCX was incepted earlier than MMGAX: FXNCX (39 years) vs MMGAX (38 years). MMGAX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FXNCX (0.71). FXNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.14 vs. MMGAX (13.00). MMGAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FXNCX (4%) vs FXNCX (4%). FXNCX (1000) and MMGAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MMGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.58 vs. FXNCX (4.28). MMGAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.13 vs. FXNCX (-2.71).
| FXNCX | MMGAX | FXNCX / MMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.90 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.99 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.399 | -0.645 | 62% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 567M | 135M | 420% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 3.30 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.28 | 4.58 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.93 | 9.91 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.71 | -0.13 | 2,083% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.11 | 10.77 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement