Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXNCX vs MSVAX
FXNCX vs MSVAX Comparison
Open Charts FXNCX vs MSVAX
FXNCX vs MSVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXNCX vs. MSVAX commentary
Jun 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXNCX is a Hold and MSVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXNCX has more cash in the bank: 578M vs. MSVAX (347M). MSVAX pays higher dividends than FXNCX: MSVAX (3.23) vs FXNCX (3.04). FXNCX was incepted earlier than MSVAX: FXNCX (39 years) vs MSVAX (42 years). MSVAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FXNCX (0.70). FXNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.14 vs. MSVAX (14.00). MSVAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FXNCX (4%) vs FXNCX (4%). FXNCX (1000) and MSVAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXNCX (8.14) and MSVAX (8.05) have marching annual gain over last year. MSVAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.50 vs. FXNCX (-0.07).
| FXNCX | MSVAX | FXNCX / MSVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.82 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.90 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.984 | 1.734 | 114% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 578M | 347M | 167% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 3.23 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.14 | 8.05 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.46 | 10.87 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.07 | 2.50 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.10 | 15.16 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers