Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXNCX vs MSVAX
FXNCX vs MSVAX Comparison
Open Charts FXNCX vs MSVAX
FXNCX vs MSVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXNCX vs. MSVAX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXNCX is a Hold and MSVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXNCX has more cash in the bank: 567M vs. MSVAX (334M). MSVAX pays higher dividends than FXNCX: MSVAX (3.35) vs FXNCX (3.16). FXNCX was incepted earlier than MSVAX: FXNCX (39 years) vs MSVAX (42 years). MSVAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FXNCX (0.71). FXNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.14 vs. MSVAX (9.00). MSVAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FXNCX (4%) vs FXNCX (4%). FXNCX (1000) and MSVAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.28 vs. MSVAX (3.76). MSVAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.57 vs. FXNCX (-2.71).
| FXNCX | MSVAX | FXNCX / MSVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.83 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.399 | -0.790 | 50% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 567M | 334M | 170% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 3.35 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.28 | 3.76 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.93 | 9.61 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.71 | -0.57 | 476% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.11 | 11.14 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement