FXR
Price
$87.14
Change
+$0.47 (+0.54%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
728.35M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UFO
Price
$43.70
Change
+$0.17 (+0.39%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
556.18M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FXR vs UFO

FXR vs UFO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) vs. Procure Space ETF (UFO)

Key Takeaways

  • FXR provides broad exposure to U.S. industrials and producer durables through a rules-based AlphaDEX selection process applied to the Russell 1000 Index, resulting in approximately 150 holdings and an expense ratio of 0.60%.
  • UFO targets the global space economy via the VettaFi Space Index, requiring constituents to derive at least 50% of revenues from space-related activities, with around 60 holdings and a higher expense ratio of 0.75%.
  • Structural differences center on scope: FXR emphasizes established industrial sectors such as transportation, machinery, and commercial services, while UFO concentrates on aerospace, satellite communications, and space infrastructure themes.
  • FXR offers greater diversification within traditional industrials, whereas UFO delivers concentrated thematic exposure that may exhibit higher volatility tied to technological and regulatory developments in space.
  • Both ETFs employ passive, index-tracking structures with periodic rebalancing, but FXR benefits from lower costs and broader sector representation compared to the specialized, higher-cost profile of UFO.
  • Investor positioning depends on objectives: FXR suits those seeking core industrials allocation, while UFO appeals to those pursuing emerging space economy growth opportunities.

Introduction

Investors seeking industrials exposure now face a choice between established sector strategies and emerging thematic opportunities. FXR and UFO do not compete directly but represent distinct approaches within overlapping industrial and technology-adjacent spaces. FXR delivers systematic exposure to producer durables and broader industrials, while UFO isolates the space economy subsector. Comparing these ETFs highlights differences in diversification, cost, and thematic focus that can inform allocation decisions in the current environment of infrastructure spending, supply-chain evolution, and commercial space advancement.

First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) Overview

The FXR ETF tracks the StrataQuant Industrials Index using the AlphaDEX methodology, a quantitative process that ranks and selects stocks from the Russell 1000 Index within the industrials and producer durables sectors. The fund holds approximately 150 securities in a modified equal-dollar weighted structure designed to identify potential alpha-generating companies. Top holdings typically include firms across transportation, machinery, and commercial services, with sector allocations heavily weighted toward industrials (around 70%) and smaller exposures to materials and financial services. The expense ratio stands at 0.60%. As a passive, rules-based product, FXR rebalances according to index methodology, offering broad diversification within U.S. industrials without active stock picking.

Procure Space ETF (UFO) Overview

The UFO ETF seeks to replicate the performance of the VettaFi Space Index, which includes companies deriving at least 50% of revenues or profits from space-related businesses such as satellite technology, rocket manufacturing, and earth observation. The fund maintains roughly 60 holdings in a passive structure, with notable concentrations in aerospace and defense, satellite communications, and related technology. Top holdings often feature companies like Garmin Ltd., Viasat Inc., and Trimble Inc. Sector allocations emphasize industrials alongside communication services and technology. The expense ratio is 0.75%. Rebalancing follows the underlying index rules, providing targeted thematic exposure to the space economy rather than broad industrial coverage.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The industrials sector continues to benefit from infrastructure initiatives, manufacturing reshoring, and supply-chain resilience efforts amid ongoing global trade dynamics. Within this landscape, the space economy represents a high-growth subset driven by commercial satellite deployment, low-Earth orbit constellations, and expanding government and private-sector investment in aerospace capabilities. Regulatory developments around spectrum allocation and space debris management, alongside macroeconomic factors such as interest-rate expectations and defense spending, influence both traditional industrials and space-related firms. Capital flows into thematic areas like space have accelerated in recent market cycles, though these segments can face elevated risks from technological hurdles and policy shifts.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, FXR has reflected the broader performance of industrial producers and transportation firms, benefiting from cyclical recovery patterns and capital expenditure trends. UFO has shown greater sensitivity to developments in satellite and aerospace technologies, with positioning influenced by innovation milestones and contract awards in the space sector. Relative volatility tends to be higher for UFO due to its concentrated thematic focus, while FXR offers more stable exposure across a wider set of industrial subsectors. Sector rotation favoring value-oriented industrials or growth-oriented technology themes can shift relative performance between the two, depending on macroeconomic conditions and earnings cycles of key holdings.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like FXR and UFO can leverage this platform for efficient discovery.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification within the industrials sector, and established index methodology, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to FXR for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and core sector exposure. UFO offers compelling thematic positioning in the space economy but carries higher costs and concentration risk. Final allocation decisions should align with individual risk tolerance and investment objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FXR vs. UFO commentary
Sep 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXR is a Hold and UFO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXR has more net assets: 728M vs. UFO (556M). UFO has a higher annual dividend yield than FXR: UFO (13.209) vs FXR (9.410). FXR was incepted earlier than UFO: FXR (19 years) vs UFO (7 years). FXR (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than UFO (0.75). FXR has a higher turnover UFO (51.00) vs UFO (51.00).
FXRUFOFXR / UFO
Gain YTD9.41013.20971%
Net Assets728M556M131%
Total Expense Ratio0.600.7580%
Turnover76.0051.00149%
Yield0.670.34197%
Fund Existence19 years7 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FXRUFO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FXR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UFO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OIGCX22.23N/A
N/A
Invesco International Growth C
ATWYX29.45N/A
N/A
AB Tax-Managed Wealth Apprec Strat Adv
QSMLX22.71N/A
N/A
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style I
MDMIX27.47N/A
N/A
Madison Dividend Income I
CGVYX31.32-0.01
-0.03%
American Funds Global Insight 529-A