Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERCX
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERCX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$29.93
Change+$0.23 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
American Funds EUPAC R3
Price$60.22
Change+$0.31 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.86B
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Hold and RERCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FZABX (1.55B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERCX: FZABX (1.64) vs RERCX (0.49). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERCX (23 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). RERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FZABX (33.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERCX: FZABX (0) vs RERCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.16 vs. RERCX (8.17). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 20.60 vs. RERCX (10.06).
| FZABX | RERCX | FZABX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.12 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.12 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.254 | 15.452 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 133B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 0.49 | 336% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.16 | 8.17 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.12 | 34.15 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.60 | 10.06 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.26 | 37.47 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement