Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERCX
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERCX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$31.22
Change+$0.12 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
American Funds EUPAC R3
Price$63.08
Change+$0.28 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.3B
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERCX commentary
Oct 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a StrongBuy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. FZABX (1.6B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERCX: FZABX (1.59) vs RERCX (0.47). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERCX (23 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). RERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FZABX (33.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERCX: FZABX (0) vs RERCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.81 vs. RERCX (9.30). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 23.99 vs. RERCX (15.29).
| FZABX | RERCX | FZABX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.12 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.12 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.876 | 20.936 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 136B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 0.47 | 337% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.81 | 9.30 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.17 | 48.65 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.99 | 15.29 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.58 | 42.15 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement