Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERCX
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERCX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$30.61
Change+$0.08 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
American Funds EUPAC R3
Price$60.44
Change+$0.35 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.22B
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Buy and RERCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FZABX (1.52B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERCX: FZABX (1.67) vs RERCX (0.51). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERCX (23 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). RERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FZABX (33.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERCX: FZABX (0) vs RERCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.40 vs. RERCX (7.73). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 23.15 vs. RERCX (11.09).
| FZABX | RERCX | FZABX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.12 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.12 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.940 | 15.874 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 135B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 0.51 | 330% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.40 | 7.73 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.52 | 23.53 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.15 | 11.09 | 209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.30 | 29.65 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement