Ad is loading...
FZABX vs RERCX
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERCX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$26.49
Change+$0.22 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
American Funds Europacific Growth R3
Price$52.10
Change+$0.22 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.82B
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Buy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 120B vs. FZABX (1.39B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERCX: FZABX (1.84) vs RERCX (0.85). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERCX (23 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RERCX (30.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERCX: FZABX (0) vs RERCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.37 vs. RERCX (-4.32). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 30.40 vs. RERCX (19.70).
| FZABX | RERCX | FZABX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.12 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.12 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.793 | -0.115 | -3,297% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 120B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 0.85 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.37 | -4.32 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.72 | -0.12 | -6,382% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.40 | 19.70 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.27 | 8.03 | 389% |