Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERCX
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERCX
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a StrongBuy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FZABX (1.86B). RERCX pays higher dividends than FZABX: RERCX (2.38) vs FZABX (1.51). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FZABX (13 years) vs RERCX (24 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.72). RERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FZABX (46.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERCX: FZABX (0) vs RERCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.68 vs. RERCX (3.80). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 1.60 vs. RERCX (-6.43).
| FZABX | RERCX | FZABX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.12 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.12 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.888 | 6.467 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 140B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 2.38 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.68 | 3.80 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.09 | 26.39 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.60 | -6.43 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.66 | 44.13 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers