Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERCX
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERCX
FZABX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Hold and RERCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. FZABX (1.81B). RERCX pays higher dividends than FZABX: RERCX (2.37) vs FZABX (1.55). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FZABX (13 years) vs RERCX (24 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.72). RERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FZABX (46.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERCX: FZABX (0) vs RERCX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.81 vs. RERCX (9.76). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 10.62 vs. RERCX (-7.42).
| FZABX | RERCX | FZABX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.12 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.12 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.654 | 3.593 | 408% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 143B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 2.37 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.81 | 9.76 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.00 | 21.45 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.62 | -7.42 | -143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.45 | 53.57 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement