Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZACX vs RGAHX
FZACX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FZACX vs RGAHX
FZACX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZACX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZACX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FZACX (4.24B). FZACX pays higher dividends than RGAHX: FZACX (0.42) vs RGAHX (0.39). FZACX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FZACX (13 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FZACX (0.44) and RGAHX (0.44) have similar cost to investors . FZACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FZACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FZACX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FZACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.33 vs. RGAHX (15.06). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 25.77 vs. FZACX (24.42).
| FZACX | RGAHX | FZACX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.111 | 10.512 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.24B | 338B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.39 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.33 | 15.06 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.85 | 54.07 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.42 | 25.77 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.64 | 113.26 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement