Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZACX vs RGAHX
FZACX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FZACX vs RGAHX
FZACX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZACX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZACX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FZACX (4.21B). FZACX pays higher dividends than RGAHX: FZACX (0.42) vs RGAHX (0.40). FZACX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FZACX (13 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FZACX (0.44) and RGAHX (0.44) have similar cost to investors . FZACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FZACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FZACX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FZACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.35 vs. RGAHX (0.18). FZACX return over 5 years is better than : 18.94 vs. RGAHX (13.78).
| FZACX | RGAHX | FZACX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.937 | 9.200 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.21B | 353B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.40 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.35 | 0.18 | 6,321% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.62 | 43.47 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.94 | 13.78 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.68 | 106.68 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement