Ad is loading...
FZACX vs RGEBX
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FZACX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Z
Price$33.33
Change-$1.91 (-5.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.32B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$64.09
Change-$3.82 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZACX vs. RGEBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZACX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. FZACX (3.32B). FZACX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FZACX (0.54) vs RGEBX (0.00). FZACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FZACX (12 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FZACX (0.44). FZACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). FZACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FZACX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. FZACX (-6.67). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 66.95 vs. FZACX (62.40).
| FZACX | RGEBX | FZACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.09 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.09 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.801 | -4.941 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.32B | 280B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.67 | -0.53 | 1,264% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.10 | 3.55 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.40 | 66.95 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.16 | 53.92 | 97% |