Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZACX vs RGEBX
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FZACX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Z
Price$39.10
Change+$0.38 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.64B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$79.23
Change+$0.77 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.78B
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZACX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZACX is a Buy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 320B vs. FZACX (3.64B). FZACX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FZACX (0.49) vs RGEBX (0.00). FZACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FZACX (12 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FZACX (0.44). FZACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). FZACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FZACX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.04 vs. FZACX (-3.14). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.69 vs. FZACX (38.59).
| FZACX | RGEBX | FZACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.09 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.09 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.502 | 10.904 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.64B | 320B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.14 | 10.04 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.43 | 57.17 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.59 | 45.69 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.56 | 78.56 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement