Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZACX vs RGEBX
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FZACX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Z
Price$39.90
Change+$0.18 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.64B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.73
Change+$0.27 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.05B
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZACX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZACX is a Buy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. FZACX (3.64B). FZACX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FZACX (0.49) vs RGEBX (0.00). FZACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FZACX (12 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FZACX (0.44). FZACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). FZACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FZACX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.90 vs. FZACX (3.97). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.14 vs. FZACX (38.55).
| FZACX | RGEBX | FZACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.09 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.09 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.175 | 13.004 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.64B | 327B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.97 | 16.90 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.55 | 55.95 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.55 | 45.14 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.93 | 78.81 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement