Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZACX vs RGEBX
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FZACX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Z
Price$40.47
Change-$0.14 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.74B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$82.44
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZACX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZACX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FZACX (3.74B). FZACX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FZACX (0.48) vs RGEBX (0.00). FZACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FZACX (12 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FZACX (0.44). FZACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). FZACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FZACX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.59 vs. FZACX (4.60). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.71 vs. FZACX (32.27).
| FZACX | RGEBX | FZACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.09 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.09 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.180 | 15.398 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.74B | 332B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.60 | 17.59 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.77 | 57.61 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.27 | 38.71 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.09 | 91.44 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement