Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZACX vs RGEBX
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FZACX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Z
Price$41.47
Change+$0.07 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.84B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.95
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZACX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZACX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. FZACX (3.84B). FZACX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FZACX (0.46) vs RGEBX (0.00). FZACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FZACX (12 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FZACX (0.44). FZACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). FZACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FZACX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.77 vs. FZACX (-0.45). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.57 vs. FZACX (30.51).
| FZACX | RGEBX | FZACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.09 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.09 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.853 | 17.511 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.84B | 337B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.45 | 10.77 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.57 | 69.56 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.51 | 36.57 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.42 | 92.27 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement