Ad is loading...
FZACX vs RGEBX
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FZACX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Z
Price$33.30
Change+$0.51 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.32B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$64.94
Change+$1.40 (+2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.66B
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZACX vs. RGEBX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZACX is a Buy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. FZACX (3.32B). FZACX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FZACX (0.54) vs RGEBX (0.00). FZACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FZACX (12 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FZACX (0.44). FZACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). FZACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FZACX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.08 vs. FZACX (-10.51). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.26 vs. FZACX (31.99).
| FZACX | RGEBX | FZACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.09 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.09 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.350 | -11.058 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.32B | 262B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.51 | -4.08 | 258% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.81 | 8.01 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.99 | 34.26 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.82 | 39.50 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers