Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZACX vs RGEBX
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FZACX vs RGEBX
FZACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZACX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZACX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FZACX (4.24B). FZACX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FZACX (0.42) vs RGEBX (0.00). FZACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FZACX (13 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FZACX (0.44). FZACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FZACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FZACX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FZACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.08 vs. RGEBX (7.66). FZACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.63 vs. RGEBX (12.07).
| FZACX | RGEBX | FZACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.08 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.08 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.585 | 6.118 | 238% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.24B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.08 | 7.66 | 314% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.19 | 42.13 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.63 | 12.07 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.63 | 104.15 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement