Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAEX vs RNWEX
FZAEX vs RNWEX Comparison
Open Charts FZAEX vs RNWEX
FZAEX vs RNWEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAEX vs. RNWEX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAEX is a Buy and RNWEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWEX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FZAEX (13.7B). FZAEX pays higher dividends than RNWEX: FZAEX (1.29) vs RNWEX (0.97). FZAEX was incepted earlier than RNWEX: FZAEX (13 years) vs RNWEX (24 years). RNWEX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FZAEX (0.80). FZAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWEX (46.00). FZAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWEX: FZAEX (0) vs RNWEX (250). FZAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.93 vs. RNWEX (26.50). FZAEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. RNWEX (14.80).
| FZAEX | RNWEX | FZAEX / RNWEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.92 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.92 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.557 | 15.053 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.7B | 90.9B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.97 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 64.93 | 26.50 | 245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 110.66 | 51.79 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.90 | 14.80 | 371% |
| Returns for 10 years | 195.73 | 124.83 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers