Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAEX vs RNWEX
FZAEX vs RNWEX Comparison
Open Charts FZAEX vs RNWEX
FZAEX vs RNWEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAEX vs. RNWEX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAEX is a Hold and RNWEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWEX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. FZAEX (13.6B). FZAEX pays higher dividends than RNWEX: FZAEX (1.32) vs RNWEX (0.97). FZAEX was incepted earlier than RNWEX: FZAEX (13 years) vs RNWEX (24 years). RNWEX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FZAEX (0.80). FZAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWEX (46.00). FZAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWEX: FZAEX (0) vs RNWEX (250). FZAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.25 vs. RNWEX (17.00). FZAEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.92 vs. RNWEX (16.86).
| FZAEX | RNWEX | FZAEX / RNWEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.92 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.92 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.024 | 16.285 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.6B | 90B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 0.97 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.25 | 17.00 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 101.73 | 53.00 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.92 | 16.86 | 326% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.12 | 110.77 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement