Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAEX vs RNWEX
FZAEX vs RNWEX Comparison
Open Charts FZAEX vs RNWEX
FZAEX vs RNWEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAEX vs. RNWEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAEX is a Buy and RNWEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWEX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FZAEX (13.9B). FZAEX pays higher dividends than RNWEX: FZAEX (1.29) vs RNWEX (0.97). FZAEX was incepted earlier than RNWEX: FZAEX (13 years) vs RNWEX (24 years). RNWEX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FZAEX (0.80). FZAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWEX (46.00). FZAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWEX: FZAEX (0) vs RNWEX (250). FZAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.09 vs. RNWEX (19.27). FZAEX return over 5 years is better than : 49.86 vs. RNWEX (13.24).
| FZAEX | RNWEX | FZAEX / RNWEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.92 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.92 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.283 | 12.535 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 90.7B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.97 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 51.09 | 19.27 | 265% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.43 | 42.88 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.86 | 13.24 | 376% |
| Returns for 10 years | 163.52 | 106.70 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement