Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAEX vs RNWHX
FZAEX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FZAEX vs RNWHX
FZAEX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAEX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAEX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FZAEX (13.7B). FZAEX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FZAEX (1.29) vs RNWHX (1.15). FZAEX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FZAEX (13 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FZAEX (0.80) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FZAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FZAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FZAEX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FZAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.93 vs. RNWHX (31.15). FZAEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| FZAEX | RNWHX | FZAEX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.72 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.72 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.557 | 18.743 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.7B | 90.9B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.15 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 64.93 | 31.15 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 110.66 | 57.37 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.90 | 20.21 | 272% |
| Returns for 10 years | 195.73 | 132.48 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement