Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAEX vs RNWHX
FZAEX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FZAEX vs RNWHX
FZAEX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAEX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAEX is a Hold and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. FZAEX (13.6B). FZAEX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FZAEX (1.32) vs RNWHX (1.15). FZAEX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FZAEX (13 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FZAEX (0.80) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FZAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FZAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FZAEX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FZAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.25 vs. RNWHX (17.19). FZAEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.92 vs. RNWHX (17.68).
| FZAEX | RNWHX | FZAEX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.72 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.72 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.024 | 16.447 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.6B | 90B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.15 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.25 | 17.19 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 101.73 | 53.84 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.92 | 17.68 | 311% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.12 | 111.44 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers