Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAFX vs RGAHX
FZAFX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FZAFX vs RGAHX
FZAFX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAFX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAFX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FZAFX (13.6B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FZAFX: RGAHX (0.39) vs FZAFX (0.00). FZAFX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FZAFX (13 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FZAFX (0.54) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FZAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FZAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FZAFX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FZAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.68 vs. RGAHX (8.63). FZAFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.59 vs. RGAHX (18.83).
| FZAFX | RGAHX | FZAFX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.44 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.44 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.550 | 6.676 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.6B | 361B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.68 | 8.63 | 263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.32 | 45.32 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.59 | 18.83 | 258% |
| Returns for 10 years | 198.48 | 109.21 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement