Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAFX vs RGAHX
FZAFX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FZAFX vs RGAHX
FZAFX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAFX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAFX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FZAFX (13.4B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FZAFX: RGAHX (0.40) vs FZAFX (0.00). FZAFX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FZAFX (13 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). FZAFX (0.54) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FZAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FZAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FZAFX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FZAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.55 vs. RGAHX (-0.41). FZAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.33 vs. RGAHX (11.23).
| FZAFX | RGAHX | FZAFX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.44 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.44 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.193 | 3.887 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4B | 357B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.55 | -0.41 | -2,801% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.99 | 35.06 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.33 | 11.23 | 333% |
| Returns for 10 years | 177.32 | 96.26 | 184% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement