Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAFX vs RGEBX
FZAFX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FZAFX vs RGEBX
FZAFX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAFX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAFX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FZAFX (12.6B). FZAFX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FZAFX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FZAFX (13 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FZAFX (0.54). FZAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FZAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FZAFX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FZAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.55 vs. RGEBX (3.59). FZAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.51 vs. RGEBX (13.38).
| FZAFX | RGEBX | FZAFX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.08 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.08 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.177 | 8.896 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 342B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.55 | 3.59 | 462% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.17 | 44.96 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.51 | 13.38 | 318% |
| Returns for 10 years | 184.02 | 92.96 | 198% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement